I just don't get it, what's the rush to have America send ground troops into Syria? It used to just be kooks like Lindsey Graham and John McCain who wanted that sort of thing but now we have JEB getting in on the action (I don't know why imitating Lindsey Graham is supposed to improve his poll standing). Given that France is all in a huff after the attacks on Paris, why do we let them spend their treasure and risk the lives of their citizens instead of involving ourselves? They have 219 combat aircraft and 406 tanks, that seems adequate to take on ISIS. And if not, they can spend more on the military. Enough of the US being the world's policeman. Look if we wanted to level Raqqa, the capital of the Caliphate, I wouldn't really mind. We can probably do it in a short amount of time. What I am against is another one of these open ended quagmires when we have bigger fish to fry, like Iran and China. We have a limited amount of treasure and a world that is going straight to hell, so we really need to make choices. Budget cuts have made it so we can't run two wars concurrently, so let's pick very, very carefully.
And screw JEB. Just what we need, another Bush doing a horrible job in managing a middle eastern war.