Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Further Proof Palestinians Are the New Nazis

It really is amazing how openly the Palestinians discuss their plans for making Judea and Samaria "Judenrein" (German for making an area "clean of Jews").  This morning, at a Christian Science Monitor sponsored breakfast, the Palestinian Ambassador to the United States endorsed the forcible transfer of Jews out of a future Palestinian State, something that he has mentioned previously.  Apparently the purpose of this is to allow the two peoples to develop "separate national identities" whatever that means.  Based on this logic, he believes Israel should evict the Palestinians who currently live within the 1949 armistice lines, which I'm pretty sure is something he doesn't support.  All he is really doing is using hand waving and diplomatic niceties to justify the ethnic cleansing of the Jews from Judea and Samaria.  Just take a look at the map of the West Bank, with Jewish areas marked in dark blue:

If the Palestinians get a state, especially based on the 1949 armistice line (something that Obama supports) all those Jews would either be forced to flee, be forcibly removed or be brutally and savagely murdered.  This would mean that places like Hebron, which had 3,500 years of Jewish settlement (starting when Abraham bought the burial plot where eventually he and his wife were buried), would be off limits to Jews, possibly forever (the Palestinian Arabs had actually tried to do this before, in 1929, killing 69 Jews and forcing the rest to flee for their lives).  Also, if Jerusalem is divided, as many anti-Israeli leftists, including Obama support, Jews might be banned from parts of the city that were first part of a Jewish state 3,000 years ago.  And imagine if they are given control of the Old City and the holiest shrine in Judaism, the Western Wall?

The dichotomy between acceptable discussion within Jewish/Israeli circles and Palestinian circles just couldn't be more stark.  Nobody even close to the mainstream of Jewish/Israeli political thought is suggesting the forcible removal of all Arabs from Israel, yet someone who is very much in the mainstream of Palestinian politics, and even  a diplomat, is talking about the forced ethnic cleansing of the Jewish people from their homes (through forcible eviction or murder, he never really specified what happens if Jewish residents say no).   How is this acceptable?  And why is Israel even thinking about negotiating with these people who clearly have no regard for human rights or Jewish life for that matter?


  1. for true nazi-style fascist totalitarianism look no further than islam...

    there is no radical, moderate, hijacked or any other nuanced semanticism type of islam. there is only islam which is based on the life of a murdering 7th century warlord.

    the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology.

    see the links in the pdf version below for more accurate info about islam

    islam is a horrible ideology for human rights

    5 key things about islam

    1. mythical beliefs - all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.

    2. totalitarianism - islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.

    3. violence - islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.

    4. dishonesty - only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo's peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.

    5. misogyny - present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.

    conclusions ??

    there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.

    islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

    graphics version


    1 page pdf version - do file/download 6kb viewer doesn't show fonts well, has better fonts header footer links, great for emailing printing etc